Thursday, July 29 2021
Search for
Switch skin
Sidebar
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
Home
Cases
United Nations System
International Court of Justice
Advisory Proceedings (Smry)
Contentious Cases (Smry)
PCIJ
Series A
Series B
Series A/B
Series C
Series D
Series E:
Series F
Other Documents
UN Administrative Tribunal
International Criminal Court
ICTRwanda
ICTYugoslavia
World Trade Organization (WTO)
International Labour Organisation (ILO)
IMF Administrative Tribunal
World Bank Administrative Tribunal (WBAT)
Human Rights
European Court Human Rights
1959-1998 – ECHR
1998-2002 – ECHR
2003-2006 – ECHR
2007-2009 – ECHR
2010-2011 – ECHR
List of Grand Chamber judgments – ECHR
UN Human Rights Committee (OHCHR)
Committee against Torture (CAT)
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD)
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Others
I.T.L.O.S.
Permanent Court of Arbitration
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
North American Free Trade Agreement – NAFTA
Investment Treaty Arbitration (ITA)
Administrative Tribunal of the Organization of American States
Iran-US Claims Tribunal – recent awards in intergovernmental cases
Court of Justice of the European Union
List of All Cases
Treaties
Treaties (All by year)
European Union
Humanitarian Law
Human Rights
UN Conferences
Law of the Sea, 1958
Future Statelessness 1959-61
Law of Treaties
Academia
All
Academic
Books
Call for
Media
Releases
Search for
Switch skin
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
Home
/
So Japan
So Japan
Academic
intlaw
22/01/2018
101
No, There Is No International Legal Basis for the “Bloody Nose” Strategy
Back to top button
Close
Search for
