Smet & Brems: When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights
Stijn Smet (Univ. of Melbourne – Law) & Eva Brems (Ghent Univ. – Law) have published When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights: Conflict or Harmony? (Oxford Univ. Press 2017). Contents include:- Stijn Smet, Introduction – Conflicts of Rights in Theoretical and Comparative Perspective
- Samantha Besson, Human Rights in Relation – A Critical Reading of the ECtHR’s Approach to Conflicts of Rights
- Stijn Smet, Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR: Towards a Structured Balancing Test
- Sébastien Van Drooghenbroeck, Conflict and Consent: Does the Theory of Waiver of Fundamental Rights Offer Solutions to Settle Their Conflicts?
- Eva Brems, Evans v UK: Three Grounds for Ruling Differently
- Lorenzo Zucca, The Comedy of Mrs Evans
- Dolores Morondo Taramundi, To Discriminate in order to Fight Discrimination: Paradox or Abuse?
- Russell Sandberg, The Future of Religious Freedom
- Dirk Voorhoof, Freedom of Expression versus Privacy and the Right to Reputation
- Leto Cariolou, Circumnavigating the Conflict Between the Right to Reputation and the Right to Freedom of Expression
- Javier Martínez-Torrón, Fernández Martínez v Spain: An Unclear Intersection of Rights
- Ian Leigh, Reversibility, Proportionality, and Conflicting Rights: Fernández Martínez v Spain
- Eva Brems, Conclusion – Conflicting Views on Conflicting Rights
Kjeldgaard-Pedersen: The International Legal Personality of the Individual
Gaetano Morelli Lectures Series: Decisions of the ICJ as Sources of International Law?
Howse, Ruiz-Fabri, Ulfstein, & Zang: The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals